All assets

Behind every project page

Nine things a project page shows, in the same order

Open any project and you will find the same layout, the same fields and the same words for results. That is what makes two projects comparable. Every fact has a source and a date, and nothing on a page is a price call.

1. 01

   The verdict

   Ready, Not yet or Not ready, with the three answers next to it and what would change it. At launch the NOTR team writes it on public facts and says so. Later the weighted vote of passport-verified analysts takes over, and we announce the switch.

   You seeA verdict at the top of the page, and every earlier verdict kept on the record, right or wrong.

2. 02

   Entry checks

   Four required checks on public chain data: the contract source is verified, there are no hidden mint or admin keys, the token can be sold, and the official links match the contract. Fail one and the project stays off the main list, with the reasons shown. Three softer checks never block entry and appear as warnings: audit published, team identifiable, supply and vesting public.

   You seeSeven lines, each passed, warning or failed, with a plain-words reason.

3. 03

   Three questions

   Is it safe? Is the price and structure fair? Does it keep its word? Every project answers the same three, in the same order, so two projects can be read side by side.

   You seeThree answers with the facts behind each one, not a single blended number.

4. 04

   Eight evidence checks

   Onchain activity, team verified, code audit, tokenomics and unlocks, kept past promises, treasury transparency, legal structure and manipulation signals. Each is marked met, partly met or not met from public data. We do not add them into one number, because a total would hide which check failed.

   You seeA checklist with what we looked at, the source and the date.

5. 05

   Price and structure

   Opening valuation, the share of supply trading on day one, the unlock calendar for the first 12 months, and what insiders paid compared with the public. Attention marks flag structures that have hurt buyers before. Beside them: what launches with similar valuation and supply did, from our backtest of 77 real launches. It is context for the reader and never a price forecast.

   You seeOne table with the same fields for every project.

6. 06

   The promise ledger

   Every dated promise goes into a public ledger: who made it, when, and what was promised. On the day it falls due it is marked met, not met, can’t verify or pending. A missed date stays on the record.

   You seeA dated list of promises and a result next to each.

7. 07

   Questions and the right of reply

   Where two statements differ, we ask the project in public and give it 7 days to answer. The answer is published unedited, next to our question. Legal and regulatory points appear only as quotes and questions, never as our claims. If there is no reply, we say so and show the date we asked.

   You seeOur question, the project’s reply as written, or the date we asked and heard nothing.

8. 08

   The open poll

   Anyone can answer the same question and leave a comment, without a passport check. It shows where the crowd stands. It never changes the verdict, because anyone can join with any number of accounts.

   You seeThe poll beside the verdict. A big gap between the two is a reason to read the arguments.

9. 09

   Sources and chain data

   Every claim links to its source: the project’s own documents, audit reports, filings, and public chain explorers. Contract addresses, holders and flows are read from the chain, not taken on the project’s word.

   You seeA source list with dates, so you can check every line yourself.

Already applied to real projects

The same method on two real tokens: one that did not pass our entry checks, and one with a provisional verdict. Both projects were sent our questions, and their replies will be published as written.